Amazon Web Services vs Hyperbolic
As of , Hyperbolic lists the lower on-demand rate on 3 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: Amazon Web Services $14.24 (us-east-1) vs Hyperbolic $5.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $8.25 (58%) cheaper.
Cloud GPU rental prices of Amazon Web Services and Hyperbolic, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Amazon Web Services | Hyperbolic | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 | $14.24 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $8.25 (58%) | Hyperbolic |
| NVIDIA H200 | $7.91 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $3.92 (50%) | Hyperbolic |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $6.88 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.19 from captured Deploy ↗ | $3.69 (54%) | Hyperbolic |
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: Amazon Web Services $14.24 (us-east-1) vs Hyperbolic $5.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $8.25 (58%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: Amazon Web Services $7.91 (us-east-1) vs Hyperbolic $3.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $3.92 (50%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Amazon Web Services $6.88 (us-east-1) vs Hyperbolic $3.19 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $3.69 (54%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: