Canopy Wave vs Gcore
As of , Gcore lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Canopy Wave $4.00 vs Gcore $3.52 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.48 (12%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Canopy Wave |  Gcore | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 53 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $4.00 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.52 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $0.48 (12%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.53 · 40 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $3.25 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.01 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $0.24 (7%) | Gcore |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Canopy Wave and Gcore, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Canopy Wave $4.00 vs Gcore $3.52 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.48 (12%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Canopy Wave $3.25 vs Gcore $3.01 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.24 (7%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: