Cato Digital vs immers.cloud
As of , Cato Digital and immers.cloud each list the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cato Digital $1.50 vs immers.cloud $2.46 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cato Digital is $0.96 (39%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Cato Digital |  immers.cloud | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $1.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.46 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.96 (39%) | Cato Digital |
| NVIDIA V100 32GB median $1.15 · 11 providers · lowest Geodd $0.16 | $1.40 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.19 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.21 (15%) | immers.cloud |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Cato Digital and immers.cloud, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cato Digital $1.50 vs immers.cloud $2.46 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cato Digital is $0.96 (39%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA V100 32GB: Cato Digital $1.40 vs immers.cloud $1.19 per GPU-hour on-demand — immers.cloud is $0.21 (15%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: