Civo vs Hikube
As of , Civo lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; Hikube wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Civo $3.49 vs Hikube $4.12 per GPU-hour on-demand — Civo is $0.63 (15%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Civo |  Hikube | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.49 · 45 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $3.49 captured Deploy ↗ | $4.12 GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $0.63 (15%) | Civo |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.89 · 53 providers · lowest Deep Infra $0.89 | $1.79 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.46 GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $0.67 (27%) | Civo |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.27 · 36 providers · lowest Edgevana $0.72 | $1.29 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.25 GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $0.04 (3%) | Hikube |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Civo and Hikube, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Civo $3.49 vs Hikube $4.12 per GPU-hour on-demand — Civo is $0.63 (15%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Civo $1.79 vs Hikube $2.46 per GPU-hour on-demand — Civo is $0.67 (27%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Civo $1.29 vs Hikube $1.25 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hikube is $0.04 (3%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: