Civo vs Tata Communications
As of , Civo lists the lower on-demand rate on 3 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Civo $3.49 vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — Civo is $2.09 (37%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Civo |  Tata Communications | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 56 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $3.49 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.58 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.09 (37%) | Civo |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.54 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $2.99 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.13 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.14 (42%) | Civo |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.52 · 42 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $1.29 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.10 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.81 (39%) | Civo |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Civo and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Civo $3.49 vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — Civo is $2.09 (37%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Civo $2.99 vs Tata Communications $5.13 per GPU-hour on-demand — Civo is $2.14 (42%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Civo $1.29 vs Tata Communications $2.10 per GPU-hour on-demand — Civo is $0.81 (39%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: