CoreWeave vs immers.cloud
As of , immers.cloud lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: CoreWeave $6.30 vs immers.cloud $4.97 per GPU-hour on-demand — immers.cloud is $1.33 (21%) cheaper.
Cloud GPU rental prices of CoreWeave and immers.cloud, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | CoreWeave | immers.cloud | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 | $6.30 captured Deploy ↗ | $4.97 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.33 (21%) | immers.cloud |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $2.70 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.35 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.35 (13%) | immers.cloud |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | CoreWeave | immers.cloud |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 | $2.58 captured | — |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.19 captured | — |
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: CoreWeave $6.30 vs immers.cloud $4.97 per GPU-hour on-demand — immers.cloud is $1.33 (21%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: CoreWeave $2.70 vs immers.cloud $2.35 per GPU-hour on-demand — immers.cloud is $0.35 (13%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: