CoreWeave vs RunComfy
As of , CoreWeave lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: CoreWeave $6.30 vs RunComfy $9.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — CoreWeave is $3.29 (34%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  CoreWeave |  RunComfy | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.56 · 50 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $6.30 captured Deploy ↗ | $9.59 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.29 (34%) | CoreWeave |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $2.00 · 58 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $2.70 captured Deploy ↗ | $4.99 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.29 (46%) | CoreWeave |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | CoreWeave | RunComfy |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 | $2.58 captured | — |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.19 captured | — |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of CoreWeave and RunComfy, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: CoreWeave $6.30 vs RunComfy $9.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — CoreWeave is $3.29 (34%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: CoreWeave $2.70 vs RunComfy $4.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — CoreWeave is $2.29 (46%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: