Crusoe vs Hikube
As of , Hikube lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; Crusoe wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Crusoe $4.29 vs Hikube $4.12 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hikube is $0.17 (4%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Crusoe |  Hikube | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.49 · 45 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $4.29 captured Deploy ↗ | $4.12 GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $0.17 (4%) | Hikube |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.89 · 53 providers · lowest Deep Infra $0.89 | $2.00 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.46 GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $0.46 (19%) | Crusoe |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.27 · 36 providers · lowest Edgevana $0.72 | $1.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.25 GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $0.25 (16%) | Hikube |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Crusoe and Hikube, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Crusoe $4.29 vs Hikube $4.12 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hikube is $0.17 (4%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Crusoe $2.00 vs Hikube $2.46 per GPU-hour on-demand — Crusoe is $0.46 (19%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Crusoe $1.50 vs Hikube $1.25 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hikube is $0.25 (16%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: