Crusoe vs Jarvislabs
As of , Jarvislabs lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; Crusoe wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Crusoe $4.29 vs Jarvislabs $4.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — Crusoe is $0.30 (7%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Crusoe |  Jarvislabs | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 51 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $4.29 captured Deploy ↗ | $4.59 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.30 (7%) | Crusoe |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.52 · 38 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $3.90 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.49 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.41 (11%) | Jarvislabs |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $2.00 · 58 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $2.00 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.49 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.51 (26%) | Jarvislabs |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Crusoe and Jarvislabs, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Crusoe $4.29 vs Jarvislabs $4.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — Crusoe is $0.30 (7%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Crusoe $3.90 vs Jarvislabs $3.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Jarvislabs is $0.41 (11%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Crusoe $2.00 vs Jarvislabs $1.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Jarvislabs is $0.51 (26%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: