Cudo Compute vs FluidCore
As of , Cudo Compute lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: Cudo Compute $1.79 (no-kristiansand-1) vs FluidCore $5.52 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $3.73 (68%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Cudo Compute | FluidCore | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.54 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $1.79 no-kristiansand-1 · GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $5.52 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.73 (68%) | Cudo Compute |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $1.50 no-kristiansand-1 · GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $2.43 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.93 (38%) | Cudo Compute |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Cudo Compute and FluidCore, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Cudo Compute $1.79 (no-kristiansand-1) vs FluidCore $5.52 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $3.73 (68%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cudo Compute $1.50 (no-kristiansand-1) vs FluidCore $2.43 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $0.93 (38%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: