Cudo Compute vs Sesterce
As of , Cudo Compute and Sesterce each list the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cudo Compute $1.50 (no-kristiansand-1) vs Sesterce $1.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.01 (1%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Cudo Compute |  Sesterce | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $2.00 · 58 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $1.50 no-kristiansand-1 · GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $1.49 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.01 (1%) | Sesterce |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.40 · 38 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $0.87 no-kristiansand-1 · GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $0.97 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.10 (10%) | Cudo Compute |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Cudo Compute and Sesterce, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cudo Compute $1.50 (no-kristiansand-1) vs Sesterce $1.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.01 (1%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Cudo Compute $0.87 (no-kristiansand-1) vs Sesterce $0.97 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $0.10 (10%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: