Cudo Compute vs Tata Communications
As of , Cudo Compute lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: Cudo Compute $1.79 (no-kristiansand-1) vs Tata Communications $5.13 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $3.34 (65%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Cudo Compute |  Tata Communications | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.54 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $1.79 no-kristiansand-1 · GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $5.13 from captured Deploy ↗ | $3.34 (65%) | Cudo Compute |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.52 · 42 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $0.87 no-kristiansand-1 · GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $2.10 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.23 (59%) | Cudo Compute |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Cudo Compute and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Cudo Compute $1.79 (no-kristiansand-1) vs Tata Communications $5.13 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $3.34 (65%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Cudo Compute $0.87 (no-kristiansand-1) vs Tata Communications $2.10 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $1.23 (59%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: