Verda vs immers.cloud
As of , Verda and immers.cloud each list the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Verda $6.63 vs immers.cloud $5.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — immers.cloud is $1.52 (23%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Difference | Cheaper | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 53 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $6.63 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.11 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.52 (23%) | immers.cloud |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $2.04 · 60 providers · lowest Yotta Labs $0.92 | $2.37 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.41 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.04 (2%) | Verda |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Verda | immers.cloud |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 | $3.32 captured | — |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.19 captured | — |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Verda and immers.cloud, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Verda $6.63 vs immers.cloud $5.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — immers.cloud is $1.52 (23%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Verda $2.37 vs immers.cloud $2.41 per GPU-hour on-demand — Verda is $0.04 (2%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: