EmpirioLabs vs Hyperbolic
As of , Hyperbolic lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: EmpirioLabs $17.80 vs Hyperbolic $5.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $11.81 (66%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  EmpirioLabs |  Hyperbolic | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 median $7.17 · 37 providers · lowest Hostinger $4.50 from | $17.80 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $11.81 (66%) | Hyperbolic |
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 53 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $7.60 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $3.61 (47%) | Hyperbolic |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of EmpirioLabs and Hyperbolic, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: EmpirioLabs $17.80 vs Hyperbolic $5.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $11.81 (66%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: EmpirioLabs $7.60 vs Hyperbolic $3.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $3.61 (47%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: