FluidCore vs Jarvislabs
As of , Jarvislabs lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: FluidCore $5.52 vs Jarvislabs $3.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Jarvislabs is $2.03 (37%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | FluidCore |  Jarvislabs | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.54 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $5.52 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.49 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.03 (37%) | Jarvislabs |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $2.43 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.49 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.94 (39%) | Jarvislabs |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of FluidCore and Jarvislabs, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: FluidCore $5.52 vs Jarvislabs $3.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Jarvislabs is $2.03 (37%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: FluidCore $2.43 vs Jarvislabs $1.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Jarvislabs is $0.94 (39%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: