FluidCore vs Thunder Compute
As of , Thunder Compute lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: FluidCore $5.52 vs Thunder Compute $3.20 per GPU-hour on-demand — Thunder Compute is $2.32 (42%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | FluidCore |  Thunder Compute | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.54 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $5.52 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.20 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.32 (42%) | Thunder Compute |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $2.43 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.09 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.34 (55%) | Thunder Compute |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of FluidCore and Thunder Compute, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: FluidCore $5.52 vs Thunder Compute $3.20 per GPU-hour on-demand — Thunder Compute is $2.32 (42%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: FluidCore $2.43 vs Thunder Compute $1.09 per GPU-hour on-demand — Thunder Compute is $1.34 (55%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: