Gcore vs Hyperbolic
As of , Gcore lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Gcore $3.10 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Hyperbolic $3.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.89 (22%) cheaper.
Cloud GPU rental prices of Gcore and Hyperbolic, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Gcore | Hyperbolic | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 | $3.10 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.89 (22%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.58 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $3.19 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.61 (19%) | Gcore |
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Gcore $3.10 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Hyperbolic $3.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.89 (22%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Gcore $2.58 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Hyperbolic $3.19 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.61 (19%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: