Gcore vs Jarvislabs
As of , Gcore lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; Jarvislabs wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Gcore $3.52 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Jarvislabs $4.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $1.07 (23%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Gcore |  Jarvislabs | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 53 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $3.52 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $4.59 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.07 (23%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.53 · 40 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $3.01 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $3.49 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.48 (14%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $2.04 · 60 providers · lowest Yotta Labs $0.92 | $1.51 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $1.49 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.02 (1%) | Jarvislabs |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Gcore and Jarvislabs, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Gcore $3.52 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Jarvislabs $4.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $1.07 (23%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Gcore $3.01 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Jarvislabs $3.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.48 (14%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Gcore $1.51 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Jarvislabs $1.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Jarvislabs is $0.02 (1%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: