Gcore vs Phala Cloud
As of , Gcore lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Gcore $3.56 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Phala Cloud $5.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $1.94 (35%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Gcore |  Phala Cloud | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 51 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $3.56 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $5.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.94 (35%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA H100 80GB (form factor not stated) median $3.80 · 25 providers · lowest Gcore $1.71 | $1.71 Everywhere Inference captured Deploy ↗ | $3.08 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.37 (44%) | Gcore |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Gcore and Phala Cloud, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Gcore $3.56 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Phala Cloud $5.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $1.94 (35%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 80GB (form factor not stated): Gcore $1.71 (Everywhere Inference) vs Phala Cloud $3.08 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $1.37 (44%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: