GPU.ai vs STACKIT
As of , GPU.ai lists the lower on-demand rate on 3 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: GPU.ai $3.99 vs STACKIT $9.01 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $5.02 (56%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  GPU.ai |  STACKIT | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.55 · 33 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $9.01 Germany South captured Deploy ↗ | $5.02 (56%) | GPU.ai |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.89 · 53 providers · lowest Deep Infra $0.89 | $1.23 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.98 Germany South captured Deploy ↗ | $1.75 (59%) | GPU.ai |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.23 · 36 providers · lowest Edgevana $0.72 | $0.80 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.95 Germany South captured Deploy ↗ | $1.15 (59%) | GPU.ai |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of GPU.ai and STACKIT, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: GPU.ai $3.99 vs STACKIT $9.01 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $5.02 (56%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: GPU.ai $1.23 vs STACKIT $2.98 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $1.75 (59%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: GPU.ai $0.80 vs STACKIT $1.95 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $1.15 (59%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: