Hyperbolic vs Jarvislabs
As of , Hyperbolic lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Hyperbolic $3.99 vs Jarvislabs $4.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $0.60 (13%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Hyperbolic |  Jarvislabs | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 53 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $4.59 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.60 (13%) | Hyperbolic |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.53 · 40 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $3.19 from captured Deploy ↗ | $3.49 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.30 (9%) | Hyperbolic |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Hyperbolic and Jarvislabs, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Hyperbolic $3.99 vs Jarvislabs $4.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $0.60 (13%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Hyperbolic $3.19 vs Jarvislabs $3.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $0.30 (9%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: