Hyperbolic vs Runcrate
As of , Hyperbolic lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: Hyperbolic $5.99 vs Runcrate $9.33 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $3.34 (36%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Hyperbolic |  Runcrate | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 median $7.17 · 37 providers · lowest Hostinger $4.50 from | $5.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $9.33 from captured Deploy ↗ | $3.34 (36%) | Hyperbolic |
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 53 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $5.13 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.14 (22%) | Hyperbolic |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Hyperbolic and Runcrate, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: Hyperbolic $5.99 vs Runcrate $9.33 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $3.34 (36%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: Hyperbolic $3.99 vs Runcrate $5.13 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $1.14 (22%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: