Hyperbolic vs Runware
As of , Hyperbolic lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: Hyperbolic $5.99 vs Runware $6.00 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $0.01 (0%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Difference | Cheaper | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 median $6.99 · 39 providers · lowest Beam $4.11 from | $5.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $6.00 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.01 (0%) | Hyperbolic |
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 56 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $4.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.51 (11%) | Hyperbolic |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Hyperbolic and Runware, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: Hyperbolic $5.99 vs Runware $6.00 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $0.01 (0%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: Hyperbolic $3.99 vs Runware $4.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $0.51 (11%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: