Hyperbolic vs Sesterce
As of , Hyperbolic lists the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 1 GPUs both offer on-demand. Not compared today: 1 more shared GPU, where one side's quote is not confirmed within 48 hours or is a thin market. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: Hyperbolic $5.99 vs Sesterce $7.17 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $1.18 (16%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Hyperbolic |  Sesterce | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 median $7.17 · 37 providers · lowest Hostinger $4.50 from | $5.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $7.17 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.18 (16%) | Hyperbolic |
Shared, not compared today
Both providers quoted these GPUs on-demand within the last 7 days, but at least one quote is not confirmed within 48 hours of the newest read (or is a marketplace floor withheld as too thin), and an unconfirmed price never decides which is cheaper. They return to the table above at the next read that confirms them.
- NVIDIA H200: Sesterce: unconfirmed
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Hyperbolic and Sesterce, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: Hyperbolic $5.99 vs Sesterce $7.17 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $1.18 (16%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: