Hyperstack vs STACKIT
As of , Hyperstack lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: Hyperstack $3.20 vs STACKIT $9.01 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperstack is $5.81 (64%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Hyperstack |  STACKIT | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.55 · 33 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $3.20 captured Deploy ↗ | $9.01 Germany South captured Deploy ↗ | $5.81 (64%) | Hyperstack |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.89 · 53 providers · lowest Deep Infra $0.89 | $1.35 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.98 Germany South captured Deploy ↗ | $1.63 (55%) | Hyperstack |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Hyperstack | STACKIT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.08 captured | — |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Hyperstack and STACKIT, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Hyperstack $3.20 vs STACKIT $9.01 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperstack is $5.81 (64%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Hyperstack $1.35 vs STACKIT $2.98 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperstack is $1.63 (55%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: