Nebius vs Tata Communications
As of , Nebius lists the lower on-demand rate on 3 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Nebius $5.40 vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — Nebius is $0.18 (3%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Difference | Cheaper | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 56 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $5.40 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.58 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.18 (3%) | Nebius |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.54 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $4.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.13 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.63 (12%) | Nebius |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.52 · 42 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $1.55 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.10 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.55 (26%) | Nebius |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Nebius and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Nebius $5.40 vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — Nebius is $0.18 (3%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Nebius $4.50 vs Tata Communications $5.13 per GPU-hour on-demand — Nebius is $0.63 (12%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Nebius $1.55 vs Tata Communications $2.10 per GPU-hour on-demand — Nebius is $0.55 (26%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: