Phala Cloud vs Sesterce
As of , Sesterce lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Phala Cloud $5.50 vs Sesterce $4.40 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $1.10 (20%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Phala Cloud |  Sesterce | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 51 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $5.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $4.40 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.10 (20%) | Sesterce |
| NVIDIA H100 80GB (form factor not stated) median $3.80 · 25 providers · lowest Gcore $1.71 | $3.08 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.75 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.33 (11%) | Sesterce |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Phala Cloud and Sesterce, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Phala Cloud $5.50 vs Sesterce $4.40 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $1.10 (20%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 80GB (form factor not stated): Phala Cloud $3.08 vs Sesterce $2.75 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.33 (11%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: