Amazon Web Services vs Cato Digital
As of , Cato Digital lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA A100 80GB: Amazon Web Services $3.43 (us-east-1) vs Cato Digital $1.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cato Digital is $1.93 (56%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Amazon Web Services |  Cato Digital | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $3.43 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.93 (56%) | Cato Digital |
| NVIDIA V100 median $1.65 · 12 providers · lowest Verda $0.23 | $3.06 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.83 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.23 (73%) | Cato Digital |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Amazon Web Services and Cato Digital, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Amazon Web Services $3.43 (us-east-1) vs Cato Digital $1.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cato Digital is $1.93 (56%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA V100: Amazon Web Services $3.06 (us-east-1) vs Cato Digital $0.83 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cato Digital is $2.23 (73%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: