Amazon Web Services vs CloudRift
As of , CloudRift lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA V100: Amazon Web Services $3.06 (us-east-1) vs CloudRift $0.25 per GPU-hour on-demand — CloudRift is $2.81 (92%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Amazon Web Services |  CloudRift | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA V100 median $0.79 · 13 providers · lowest Trooper.AI $0.24 from | $3.06 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.25 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.81 (92%) | CloudRift |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.29 · 39 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.69 | $1.86 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.69 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.17 (63%) | CloudRift |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Amazon Web Services and CloudRift, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA V100: Amazon Web Services $3.06 (us-east-1) vs CloudRift $0.25 per GPU-hour on-demand — CloudRift is $2.81 (92%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Amazon Web Services $1.86 (us-east-1) vs CloudRift $0.69 per GPU-hour on-demand — CloudRift is $1.17 (63%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: