Microsoft Azure vs Gcore
As of , Gcore lists the lower on-demand rate on 3 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: Microsoft Azure $11.06 (eastus) vs Gcore $2.58 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $8.48 (77%) cheaper.
Cloud GPU rental prices of Microsoft Azure and Gcore, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Microsoft Azure | Gcore | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $11.06 eastus captured Deploy ↗ | $2.58 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $8.48 (77%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA H200 | $10.60 westus2 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.10 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $7.50 (71%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $3.67 eastus2 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.43 Everywhere Inference captured Deploy ↗ | $2.24 (61%) | Gcore |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Microsoft Azure | Gcore |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.04 captured | — |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $0.68 captured | — |
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Microsoft Azure $11.06 (eastus) vs Gcore $2.58 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $8.48 (77%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: Microsoft Azure $10.60 (westus2) vs Gcore $3.10 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $7.50 (71%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Microsoft Azure $3.67 (eastus2) vs Gcore $1.43 (Everywhere Inference) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $2.24 (61%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: