Microsoft Azure vs RunComfy
As of , Microsoft Azure and RunComfy each list the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Microsoft Azure $10.60 (westus2) vs RunComfy $9.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — RunComfy is $1.01 (10%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Microsoft Azure |  RunComfy | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 51 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $10.60 westus2 captured Deploy ↗ | $9.59 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.01 (10%) | RunComfy |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $2.00 · 58 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $3.67 eastus2 captured Deploy ↗ | $4.99 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.32 (26%) | Microsoft Azure |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Microsoft Azure | RunComfy |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $0.68 captured | — |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Microsoft Azure and RunComfy, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Microsoft Azure $10.60 (westus2) vs RunComfy $9.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — RunComfy is $1.01 (10%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Microsoft Azure $3.67 (eastus2) vs RunComfy $4.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Microsoft Azure is $1.32 (26%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: