Microsoft Azure vs Tata Communications
As of , Tata Communications lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: Microsoft Azure $11.06 (eastus) vs Tata Communications $5.13 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $5.93 (54%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Microsoft Azure |  Tata Communications | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.54 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $11.06 eastus captured Deploy ↗ | $5.13 from captured Deploy ↗ | $5.93 (54%) | Tata Communications |
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 56 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $10.60 westus2 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.58 from captured Deploy ↗ | $5.02 (47%) | Tata Communications |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Microsoft Azure | Tata Communications |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.04 captured | — |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Microsoft Azure and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Microsoft Azure $11.06 (eastus) vs Tata Communications $5.13 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $5.93 (54%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: Microsoft Azure $10.60 (westus2) vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $5.02 (47%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: