Cato Digital vs Lambda
As of , Cato Digital and Lambda each list the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cato Digital $1.50 vs Lambda $2.79 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cato Digital is $1.29 (46%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Cato Digital |  Lambda | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $1.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.79 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.29 (46%) | Cato Digital |
| NVIDIA V100 median $1.65 · 12 providers · lowest Verda $0.23 | $0.83 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.79 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.04 (5%) | Lambda |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Cato Digital and Lambda, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cato Digital $1.50 vs Lambda $2.79 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cato Digital is $1.29 (46%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA V100: Cato Digital $0.83 vs Lambda $0.79 per GPU-hour on-demand — Lambda is $0.04 (5%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: