Cato Digital vs Sesterce
As of , Cato Digital lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; Sesterce wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cato Digital $1.50 vs Sesterce $1.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.01 (1%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Cato Digital |  Sesterce | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $1.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.49 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.01 (1%) | Sesterce |
| NVIDIA V100 32GB median $1.15 · 11 providers · lowest Geodd $0.16 | $1.40 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.57 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.17 (46%) | Cato Digital |
| NVIDIA V100 median $1.65 · 12 providers · lowest Verda $0.23 | $0.83 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.57 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.74 (68%) | Cato Digital |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Cato Digital and Sesterce, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cato Digital $1.50 vs Sesterce $1.49 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.01 (1%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA V100 32GB: Cato Digital $1.40 vs Sesterce $2.57 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cato Digital is $1.17 (46%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA V100: Cato Digital $0.83 vs Sesterce $2.57 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cato Digital is $1.74 (68%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: