fal vs Gcore
As of , Gcore lists the lower on-demand rate on 3 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B300: fal $12.99 vs Gcore $6.63 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $6.36 (49%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Difference | Cheaper | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B300 median $9.00 · 26 providers · lowest Deep Infra $5.89 | $12.99 captured Deploy ↗ | $6.63 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $6.36 (49%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 53 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $6.00 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.52 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $2.48 (41%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA H100 80GB (form factor not stated) median $3.50 · 25 providers · lowest Koyeb $2.50 | $4.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.12 Virtual GPU captured Deploy ↗ | $1.38 (31%) | Gcore |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of fal and Gcore, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B300: fal $12.99 vs Gcore $6.63 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $6.36 (49%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: fal $6.00 vs Gcore $3.52 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $2.48 (41%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 80GB (form factor not stated): fal $4.50 vs Gcore $3.12 (Virtual GPU) per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $1.38 (31%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: