GPU.ai vs Tata Communications
As of , GPU.ai lists the lower on-demand rate on 4 of the 4 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: GPU.ai $5.29 vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $0.29 (5%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  GPU.ai |  Tata Communications | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 56 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $5.29 from captured Deploy ↗ | $5.58 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.29 (5%) | GPU.ai |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.54 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $5.13 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.14 (22%) | GPU.ai |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.52 · 42 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $0.80 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.10 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.30 (62%) | GPU.ai |
| NVIDIA L4 median $0.80 · 24 providers · lowest Hikube $0.27 GPU only | $0.59 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.95 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.36 (38%) | GPU.ai |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of GPU.ai and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: GPU.ai $5.29 vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $0.29 (5%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: GPU.ai $3.99 vs Tata Communications $5.13 per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $1.14 (22%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: GPU.ai $0.80 vs Tata Communications $2.10 per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $1.30 (62%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L4: GPU.ai $0.59 vs Tata Communications $0.95 per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $0.36 (38%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: