Hugging Face vs Tata Communications
As of , Hugging Face lists the lower on-demand rate on 3 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Hugging Face $5.00 (aws) vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hugging Face is $0.58 (10%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Hugging Face |  Tata Communications | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 56 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $5.00 aws captured Deploy ↗ | $5.58 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.58 (10%) | Hugging Face |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.52 · 42 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $1.80 aws captured Deploy ↗ | $2.10 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.30 (14%) | Hugging Face |
| NVIDIA L4 median $0.80 · 24 providers · lowest Hikube $0.27 GPU only | $0.80 aws captured Deploy ↗ | $0.95 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.15 (15%) | Hugging Face |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Hugging Face and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Hugging Face $5.00 (aws) vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hugging Face is $0.58 (10%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Hugging Face $1.80 (aws) vs Tata Communications $2.10 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hugging Face is $0.30 (14%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L4: Hugging Face $0.80 (aws) vs Tata Communications $0.95 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hugging Face is $0.15 (15%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: