OVHcloud vs Tata Communications
As of , Tata Communications lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; OVHcloud wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: OVHcloud $5.87 (EU (FR)) vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $0.30 (5%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Difference | Cheaper | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.54 · 56 providers · lowest Beam $2.09 from | $5.87 EU (FR) captured Deploy ↗ | $5.58 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.30 (5%) | Tata Communications |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.52 · 42 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $1.80 US captured Deploy ↗ | $2.10 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.30 (14%) | OVHcloud |
| NVIDIA L4 median $0.80 · 24 providers · lowest Hikube $0.27 GPU only | $1.00 US captured Deploy ↗ | $0.95 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.05 (5%) | Tata Communications |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of OVHcloud and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: OVHcloud $5.87 (EU (FR)) vs Tata Communications $5.58 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $0.30 (5%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: OVHcloud $1.80 (US) vs Tata Communications $2.10 per GPU-hour on-demand — OVHcloud is $0.30 (14%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L4: OVHcloud $1.00 (US) vs Tata Communications $0.95 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $0.05 (5%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: