QuantaCloud vs RunComfy
As of , QuantaCloud lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA A100 80GB: QuantaCloud $1.48 (Midwest - us-midwest-2) vs RunComfy $4.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — QuantaCloud is $3.51 (70%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  QuantaCloud |  RunComfy | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $2.00 · 58 providers · lowest CloudRift $1.05 | $1.48 Midwest - us-midwest-2 captured Deploy ↗ | $4.99 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.51 (70%) | QuantaCloud |
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 median $0.59 · 18 providers · lowest Thunder Compute $0.35 | $0.48 Midwest - us-midwest-2 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.02 (81%) | QuantaCloud |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of QuantaCloud and RunComfy, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: QuantaCloud $1.48 (Midwest - us-midwest-2) vs RunComfy $4.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — QuantaCloud is $3.51 (70%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA RTX A6000: QuantaCloud $0.48 (Midwest - us-midwest-2) vs RunComfy $2.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — QuantaCloud is $2.02 (81%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: