Crusoe vs Hyperbolic
As of , Hyperbolic lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Crusoe $4.29 vs Hyperbolic $3.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $0.30 (7%) cheaper.
Cloud GPU rental prices of Crusoe and Hyperbolic, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Crusoe | Hyperbolic | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 | $4.29 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.30 (7%) | Hyperbolic |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $3.90 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.19 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.71 (18%) | Hyperbolic |
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Crusoe $4.29 vs Hyperbolic $3.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $0.30 (7%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Crusoe $3.90 vs Hyperbolic $3.19 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $0.71 (18%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: