Cudo Compute vs packet.ai
As of , Cudo Compute and packet.ai each list the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cudo Compute $1.50 (no-kristiansand-1) vs packet.ai $1.43 (Dedicated) per GPU-hour on-demand — packet.ai is $0.07 (5%) cheaper.
Cloud GPU rental prices of Cudo Compute and packet.ai, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Cudo Compute | packet.ai | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.50 no-kristiansand-1 · GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $1.43 Dedicated captured Deploy ↗ | $0.07 (5%) | packet.ai |
| NVIDIA L40S | $0.87 no-kristiansand-1 · GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $0.92 Dedicated captured Deploy ↗ | $0.05 (5%) | Cudo Compute |
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cudo Compute $1.50 (no-kristiansand-1) vs packet.ai $1.43 (Dedicated) per GPU-hour on-demand — packet.ai is $0.07 (5%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Cudo Compute $0.87 (no-kristiansand-1) vs packet.ai $0.92 (Dedicated) per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $0.05 (5%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: