packet.ai vs Sesterce
As of , Sesterce lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: packet.ai $6.99 (Dedicated) vs Sesterce $4.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $2.88 (41%) cheaper.
Cloud GPU rental prices of packet.ai and Sesterce, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | packet.ai | Sesterce | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 | $6.99 Dedicated captured Deploy ↗ | $4.11 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.88 (41%) | Sesterce |
| NVIDIA L40S | $0.92 Dedicated captured Deploy ↗ | $0.76 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.16 (17%) | Sesterce |
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: packet.ai $6.99 (Dedicated) vs Sesterce $4.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $2.88 (41%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: packet.ai $0.92 (Dedicated) vs Sesterce $0.76 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.16 (17%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: