Amazon Web Services vs Sesterce
Cloud GPU rental prices of Amazon Web Services and Sesterce, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled.
As of , Sesterce lists the lower on-demand rate on 3 of the 3 GPUs both offer. On the priciest shared card, NVIDIA B200: Amazon Web Services $14.24 (us-east-1) vs Sesterce $4.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $10.13 (71%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Amazon Web Services | Sesterce | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 | $14.24 us-east-1 | $4.11 from | $10.13 (71%) | Sesterce |
| NVIDIA H200 | $7.91 us-east-1 | $2.48 from | $5.43 (69%) | Sesterce |
| NVIDIA L40S | $1.86 us-east-1 | $0.76 from | $1.10 (59%) | Sesterce |
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: Amazon Web Services $14.24 (us-east-1) vs Sesterce $4.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $10.13 (71%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: Amazon Web Services $7.91 (us-east-1) vs Sesterce $2.48 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $5.43 (69%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Amazon Web Services $1.86 (us-east-1) vs Sesterce $0.76 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $1.10 (59%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: