Hostinger vs Sesterce
As of , Sesterce lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: Hostinger $4.50 vs Sesterce $4.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.39 (9%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Hostinger | Sesterce | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 median $6.89 · 32 providers · lowest Deep Infra $3.69 | $4.50 from captured Deploy ↗ | $4.11 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.39 (9%) | Sesterce |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.21 · 33 providers · lowest Beam $0.76 from | $0.96 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.76 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.20 (21%) | Sesterce |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Hostinger and Sesterce, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: Hostinger $4.50 vs Sesterce $4.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.39 (9%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Hostinger $0.96 vs Sesterce $0.76 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.20 (21%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: